While I am very glad that the monstrously bad ruling of Roe v. Wade has been overturned —after all, the 10TH Amendment is quite clear about the States (or people) retaining authority in areas wherein the Constitution does not delegate the power to the federal government— it is necessary for me to impress to you that this could be the first step in voiding privacy.
You see, the decision of Roe held that there was a Constitutional right to the privacy of medical records from government —and there is, via the 4TH Amendment— the Supreme Court decided that ‘penumbras and emanations’ if the Constitution regarding that privacy invalidated the ability of the States to have their own laws in the area, expanding the power of federal government and thus their own power. With the overturn of Roe, we may be seeing the first steps into abolishing the notion of the Right to Privacy, as we have seen the court bend over backwards to validate ‘exigent circumstances’ and void the 4TH Amendment and it’s requirements that searches be authorized via warrant… and this may be the plan of those trying to manipulate the politics: overturn Roe, use the outrage to fuel the election of candidates who do not care about bodily autonomy, then destroy the legal notion of a right to privacy, and finally do away with bodily autonomy. (This would make Roe’s overturn moot: the government would be the decider of abortions, and more: it could force them [or pregnancy], as well as the gene-therapies.)
In the end, it’s very simple: we need to turn to God and pray, that we might walk in wisdom and righteousness. — This is not winning the war, but merely a single battle… and it is absolutely certain that there will be a counter-attack, whether or not this can be made into a trap or held, this is sure.
There are many issues that can, and should, be taken with this overreach, especially considering how certain people are pushing for a ‘Vaccine Passport’ system which could (read ‘will be’) be tied into economic rights, setting the precedent at least that “no one may buy or sell” dependent on some government controlled/approved ‘permission-slip’.
One thing to notice, however, is that the case wherein the Supreme Court found a Constitutional right to privacy of medical records, especially from the government, is now being threatened with being overturned…
Throwing Out the Bath-Water with the Baby
People have been commenting on the possibility of the Supreme Court overturning the Roe v. Wade decision, from those dramatically predicting (or threatening) revolt/civil-war to Karl Denninger’s prediction of ‘nothing’. — However, I think that this is exactly where our enemy wants to go: They *wish* to destroy all protections against instituting their stranglehold control over every aspect of your life, and what do they care if this causes a civil war? A civil war would be advantageous to them: for it would deplete both physical stores (the means of resisting) as well as erode the morale aspect (the will to resist); thus they win should Roe be overturned and cause civil war, thus they win if only Roe is overturned (for then there is no ‘precedent’ of the Supreme Court recognizing a Constitutional right to the privacy of medical records), thus they win if Roe is left in-place (for they hate life).
And so we find ourselves offered a ‘Gotcha!’ scenario, like when the Pharisees sent their disciples with this question to Jesus: “Is it lawful to pay taxes to Cesar?” (If Jesus answered ‘Yes’ they would point out how Jesus was endorsing Caesar’s authority and claims, which included the blasphemy of claiming divinity, under Jewish law; if he said ‘No’ then they could convict him under Rome’s law.) — But here Jesus sidestepped the entire issue by asking for a coin, pointing out that Caesar’s image and inscription [name] were on it, saying: “Give unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.”
We, too, need the divine wisdom of Jesus here: for on the one hand we are offered continued child-sacrifice, and on the other hand we are offered sacrificing the whole people into slavery — pray, for wisdom, and Justice, and mercy.
What do these three fallacies have in common? What purposes do they serve? What goals do these purposes advance? Are any of them reinforcing the others? Why, even should we consider them fallacies? (This one’s simple: because they lead to fallacious reasoning or modeling of the world.) …But I’m getting ahead of myself, let’s define and describe what I mean for each of these items.
The “Let’s Go Brandon!” meme is a masterful judo throw: taking the news’s own willful misunderstanding and formatting it in a way that cannot be purged by most social-media Terms of Service without being blatantly a political censorship. After all, it doesn’t use any profanities, it doesn’t contain ‘misinformation’, it succinctly expresses dissatisfaction with President Biden (and, arguably, the administration) and in order to understand this you need the context. — All of this is well and good, except that it’s obvious that Biden is a puppet, barely capable of reading a Teleprompter.
The Idea that “fraud vitiates everything” means that the fact that the 2020 elections were fraudulently conducted (both with voter fraud and with procedural/legal violations) to give Biden the ‘win’ means that we should instead give the win to Trump. — This fallacy is predicated on many assumptions, from the process of correcting an election to that of structures and forms of law and the legal system itself. A prime example here is ‘decertification’ which, as it turns out, simply does not exist. It is not a thing, legally-speaking.
Simply that the government can say and do whatever it wants, and you must obey; that the mere declaration has legitimacy (by its own existence) and therefore all lawful authority.
The commonalities of these fallacies can be summed up in a single word: Redirection.
Brandon: As noted in its description, this redirects away from the obvious fact that Biden is not the one in charge; it redirects the displeasure of the people from those who are pushing these disastrous policies onto the obvious scapegoat of Joe Biden.
Reinstatement: This redirects the will of people who want to see Justice, lawfully and rightly obtained, into something that will erode the law itself; there is no such legal thing as a Presidential ‘Reinstatement’, it simply does not exist. (The counting and certifying of elector’s votes that Congress does IS the official declaration that the votes are legitimate.)
Mandates: Our old friend, “Appeal to Self-Authority” pops its head up; this is, yet again, “my own position proves I am good, if I were not good I would not be in this position; therefore, whatever I say is good and the exercise of the authority granted in my position is as well.”
Let us term this the ‘Redirective Rule’ — and define it as:
The desire/tactic of the redirection of thought or mental model to escape properly Just accountability which permeates, at every level, the operations of our enemy.
The Purposes, and How They Work Together
By re-directing displeasure to Biden, the problem mentally shifts from the organization itself and those in positions of power to a single man; this, in turn, encourages the idea that ‘if we could just get rid of X, then things would get better.’ Combine this with ‘Reinstatement’ and those people in power can dump Biden, put Trump in, and continue their mission having appeased all those pushing for Trump (as well as many who were alienated by the policies that “Biden” put out). — This leaves in-place much of the framework that these authorities have been putting in-place, rather than destroying their mandates and the underlying ‘authorizations’ for them.
We are witnessing what Yuri Bezmenov’s lecture “The Four Stages of Ideological Subversion” as ‘Destabilization’ — where the subversion is concentrated on “economy, foreign-relations, defense-systems” — and what else would the shredding of the Constitution (e.g. via ‘Reinstatement’) do but give cover to those who are subverting our country and nation as they continue for the Coup de Grâce? (And you must remember that it was Trump who showed he favored Big-Business over small-business and the American people for the ‘quarantines’/’lockdowns’, especially for the ‘forgivable loans’ and bailouts that went to the corporations while pushing couch-change to the people to both shut them up and undercut any complaint by making them participant & beneficiary in bailouts.)
The TL;DR here is this: all of these fallacies have the ability to work together for the destruction of large portions of the American culture and its people. Those in power are guiding what Bezmenov termed ‘Destabilization’ in order to bring up a ‘Crisis’ which will allow all the bullshit they’ve been foisting on our people to become ‘Normalized’.
During the riots of 2020, we saw plainly the implementation of ‘Anarcho-Tyranny ’ — where the politically-disfavored were selectively prosecuted and the favored allowed to go free — and it is from here that we must recognize the nature of our enemies: they prefer to put all conflict into a “Heads, we win; Tails, you lose” and/or “Let’s you and him fight” setting. This is why they do not want a unified American people, but rather exploitable mindset-/identity-differences like ‘White’ vs ‘Black’… and we’ve seen them go out of their way to manufacture these differences: remember how the news media corporations pushed Zimmerman first as ‘White’, then after it came out that he was ‘Hispanic’ pushed forward the ‘White Hispanic’ label?
That is exactly what is in play here, and now. It is almost fractal in how it is set up, the small being an instance of the design of the large, structured to force the outcome that the aforementioned power-elite and enemies (and the intersection of these is essentially the sets themselves) wish, while simultaneously giving them deniability, removing responsibility/accountability, and covering their involvement.
Since this Redirective Rule is fractal in nature, we can see it in play on the Ghislaine Maxwell trial — All of the charges brought forth are on the sexual aspects; which conveniently sidesteps even talking about the purpose that these were to achieve: blackmail and corruption of officials to ensure foreign control of said officials and, thence, the control of the top positions of the government both elective and un-elected. Thus why we heard, from Trump’s own mouth, an admission not only that the Congress is controlled by a foreign entity, but that he believes such foreign-control to be right. — about how the international scope of things are being redirected into ‘national’, and the vast (multi-national) conspiracy- and espionage-organization is framed in terms of a small sex-ring.
This Redirective Rule applies even in the realm of the corporal world and the spiritual world. Framing things in terms of “It’s Israel!!” and directing all the focus there is, again, the Rule being applied: if the biggest lie the Devil ever got people to believe is he doesn’t exist, the second is that his agents (which, yes, can be nations) are where the responsibility/accountability ends. — This isn’t to say that the agents bear no responsibility, they obviously do.
The real issue is the framing:
Brandon: Frames the issue in figureheads, directing people away from the underlying corruption.
Reinstatement: Frames the issue in a manner that destroys Jurisprudence and law, masquerading as “justice!” while shutting out Justice.
(I.e. Why would you seek Justice-the-virtue, when you have ‘justice’ looks-like-its-correcting-an-error?)
Mandate: Frames things in an appeal to the government’s own authority, so that any objection might be re-framed as a “rebellion” and “rejection” of all the government’s authority.
BLM: Frames the injustice and corruption of Law Enforcement into a sort of “only for Blacks issue”, which is absurd because it’s been an issue since at least the War on Drugs made it profitable for police to be corrupt.
Antifa: While some of this is True Believer shit, there’s a good portion that are pulled into this either by deception. (e.g. “You don’t want the NAZIs to win, do you?”)
SJWs: Frames the natural desire for Justice into serving injustice, typically by twisting definitions, calling ‘good’ what is evil and ‘evil’ what is good.
I can’t tell you that tell you that Israel-the-State doesn’t deserve the US to declare war and crush it, because from the USS Liberty to 11–Sep–2001 & from the Maxwell Espionage-Ring to the War on Terror, they absolutely do… the problem is that unless we-as-a-people “get right with God” by turning to Jesus, we are doomed. Jesus is the only one that can save us from these fractal traps, He is the only one that can heal the absurd self-inflicted wounds of the mandates, He is the only one who can heal the damage and destruction inflicted on us by our enemies. — The TL;DR here is found succinctly in buy viagra austin “Except the Lord build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain.”
It’s not my best work, but I figure that getting it out now rather than later is preferable. The main meat of this is condensing the legitimacy argument of my EO-rejection into the first inside-page and expanding on the religious-objection on the back cover:
Have you ever seen something and you just know what’s going to happen? — This happened to me when I was seeing a barrage of articles about the Taliban offensive in Afghanistan as the US withdraws, to include capturing materiel: humvees, artillery, Blackhawk helicopters, weapons-caches (armories), and so on. I thought ‘this is odd’, and put it out of my mind… until I remembered something and everything ‘clicked’ into place.
This year is the 20TH anniversary of the 9/11 attack, and this? …this is setting the stage for another 9/11. One where they’re going to have “terrorists” operating US military equipment killing US civilians, trying to ignite “The War on Terror” for a whole new generation that knows nothing of what things were like before 9/11.
The leaving of materiel is key to this realization: I was in the Army —National Guard to be precise— and losing your personal weapon (M–16, M–4, etc) carries some stiff punishments, how much moreso things like Blackhawks and humvees? This is not a “pull-out”, but actively arming our enemies, this is stuff that is not given to privates, but generals and flag-officers and field-grade officers.
In short: this pull-out is, in its execution, treason: giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
Add to all this the talks of allowing refugees, hundreds of thousands of them, and things become even clearer that this is all preparing the setting: “Taliban” “terrorists” who, ‘unfortunately’ got through our detection from the ‘refugees’ using US equipment killing civilians. — Never mind the logistics here, this isn’t about foreigners from afar enacting this, but the narrative which will be spun by the traitors here.
And, as if that wasn’t bad enough, they’re rubbing our noses in the whole thing. I believe it to be planned, and that the people executing everything are signaling it, laughing at the average person in their arrogance. — Just look at this: the last plane to leave Afghanistan, labeled with September 11TH (international date format, not US date-format).
I hope and pray I’m wrong, but there’s no excuse for the crescendo of cluster-fuck we’re seeing.
John Adams proclaimed a day of “Solemn Humiliation, Fasting, and Prayer” in 1798, and given the obvious hard times we have coming — everything from widespread corruption, to foreign-bought politicians, from 30 million unemployed to the obvious favor shown to illegal-aliens — it is obvious that we need help. And only Divine help will do.
So, here is my prayer, short and simple:
Father God, please care for us, provide our food and clothes; assist us in putting into positions of authority those who will do Justly, who love mercy, and who walk humbly with you — not because of who we are, but because of who You are, and who you’ve shown yourself to be by the work accomplished on the Cross — Amen.